Tekkonkinkreet follows two street
orphans, Black and White, living in Treasure Town, a crumbling district
being fought over by scavenging mobsters and soulless developers.
Black and White are aptly named, Black being violent and aggressive,
while conversely White is innocent and peaceful. Black and White are
urban Lost Boys in a town filled with pirates, fighting ever
increasing odds to achieve their dreams. To summarise the film much more would
ruin the experience, as this films narrative story is a relatively
small part of the overall experience. Although featuring a relatively
involved plot, the film focusses on the character stories that
surround the larger narrative. We see how plot elements affect the
characters, rather than how the characters affect the plot.
All films, if not all stories, should
be led by character and in films without obvious characters, such as
more visual works, the character can be an abstract such as a
location or a feeling. For example, 'Koyaanisqatsi’s' lead characters
are the world and humanity as a whole.
The thing is, I can appreciate nice
characterisation but if I can’t believe that the character has been
characterised from living in that world then the story fundamentally
fails and once a story has crossed that failure line there is
narratively speaking, no going back. You don’t necessarily need a
fascinating world for your characters to inhabit but you do need one
that it is basically believable for your particular characters to
exist within. You need a world built from a basic level of structure that makes sense.
Art and craft are intrinsically linked and both should complement each other. Craft seems to
generally be separated and receive the raw end of the deal, being
viewed as the necessary evil that allows the artistic vision to
come alive. The issue is that a well-crafted story is in itself an
art, having good ideas and characters well elevate it massively but
the structure alone can be beautiful, much like with an empty
honeycomb. Character however, requires some degree of truth to
function, a good character can elevate a bad narrative but it can’t
even exist in a non-believable one.
Now the above rant was for a reason, it
was inspired by Tekkonkinkreet. Tekkonkinkreet breaks almost every
rule it can. The characters exist in a basically real world, one that
follows the same scientific and mathematical rules as ours. That
being said characters constantly break these rules, doing ridiculous
things such as jumping hundreds of feet into the air and surviving
the fall afterwards. The thing is that these rules are arbitrary, some characters can do impossible things and some cannot
without any apparent reason given. This unbelievable world becomes
completely believable however, when filled with the characters that
inhabit it. The world is a mixture of unbelievable and believable,
because the characters are themselves both insane and sane. The
narrative form works with the character function and they work
very well together indeed.
The story is about very abstract
concepts, such as the universal balance of good and evil and these
elements are worked into a symbolic story of brotherhood. The
strengths of the characters seemingly exist in one reality while
their weaknesses exist in our own, creating a subjective reality that
we are presented with, to interpret as we wish.
The basic heart of the story is the
relationship between the two orphans, the older raising the younger
and the problems they encounter. The fact that their story remains
emotionally strong and real, despite the problems they encounter
including aliens and demons, is a real testament to how well the
characters are handled. This is primarily because the entire story is
focussed on this brotherhood dynamic and even when it is not
focussing on Black and White, it focuses on the brotherhood of two
Yakusa and the partnership of two detectives. This helps the story of
Black and White as it allows other facets of their nature to be
explored without changing their characters to do so.
Tekkonkinkreet is a very tonal film and
it deals with a lot of interesting concepts. Black and White are
completely different in personality but are unable to function
without the other, Black is yin to White’s Yang. In addition it is
heavily implied that Black and White are suffering from mental
problems that make them so distinctly polar in nature. White
describes himself as being “made broken”. The fact that they have
both been abandoned alone at the threshold of society, along with the
venerable elderly is a powerful message.
In addition to this, there is also a
strong environmental focus to the film. Black is almost like a
spirit of nature, wanting to stop the extensive redevelopment of what
he calls “my town” and keep it the way it is. White dreams of
moving out of the city entirely and living at the beach. Both of them
are trying to grow an apple tree within the city and are upset at how
it won’t grow.
Primarily the film tells of what it is
to be human. Tekkonkinkreet questions what we have lost as a species
by losing our connection to nature and to the mystic, to gain
‘progress’.
The animation is primarily what people
reference when talking about the film and it is very stylised and
impressive. The animation is very fluid, mixing seamlessly between
moments of calm and hyper kinetic action sequences. The camera shakes
as the action sequences build, like a drink that is about to explode
before following the characters as if they had been filmed live
action. That being said you can see where the budget of this film has
been spent, the action sequences run at a far higher frame rate to
those of the slower and although it creates a tonal shift it would
have been nice to see some of these more thoughtful sequences looking
a bit more visually realistic.
The designs of the characters are also
very effective with each characters design aesthetic being based on
their personality, down to the shape of their faces. The city is also
very expressive, being a character in its own right. The detail put
into the city, considering its size is incredible. It looks like a
moving art book.
Tekkonkinkreet is a very interesting
film. It asks a lot of questions and leaves it up to the audience to
answer them. It is a beautiful film but one that is both visually and
tonally, not for everyone. The balance between reality and the
impossible is generally handled very well but towards the end does
become fairly firmly rooted in the impossible at the expense of some
of the emotional realism the film has portrayed up to that point.
That being said the film is easy to recommend. Tekkonkinkreet made me
think and feel more than any film has in a long time. Films about
ideas are fairly common but good films about ideas don’t come along
that often.
No comments:
Post a Comment