Trees have grown everywhere around the
world, covering it overnight. What caused the trees to grow like this
and who is responsible? Can The Doctor figure these mysteries out and
return the world to how it was? Or has humanity entered “The Tree
Age”?
So I quite often get the feeling that
‘Doctor Who’ has been made for idiots. This week I had the
rather refreshing alternative of having it made by idiots. The
concept for this episode raises so many questions and refuses to
answer any of them properly. It’s baffling how many elements of ‘In
the Forest of the Night’ are not explained, properly researched or
simply don’t make sense. Now I don't want to put all the blame with Frank Cottrell Boyce. This episode really feels like a first draft, it just doesn't hold together and it's hard to believe such a well established writer could have intended his episode to be like this.
So the episode opens with Maebh Arden,
as in the Forest of Arden, running towards the Tardis. She asks to
come in because “something” is following her. What this something
might be is never explained. It could be the glowing things we see
later, that’s the most likely option. Or it could be the wolves but
we aren’t told. Then again, The Doctor is confronted by a little
girl telling him she is being followed and he doesn’t care to ask
by what, so why should we?
We see the earth from space and see how
it is entirely covered with trees. To run this point home we see
comedy news articles talking about the new amount of trees. I have to
hope that if trees suddenly covered the entire earth over night the
news media may deal with bigger questions than if people can ride a
train to work or if football matches might be cancelled. This is
fundamentally the biggest issue with this episode, the sudden trees
are being treated like a giant peach or some other bizarre situation
from a children’s book. Nobody seems to really care.
How many people died when the trees
grew? Even if we assume that nobody was directly impaled on them, so
many people must have died. What about the trees that suddenly grew
on the busy roads for example? What about the lootings and the mass
murder? The episode directly mentions that the roads need to be
cleared for emergency services. With the routes blocked to the
hospitals anyone injured by the trees or otherwise would have died.
Even if we assume, as the episode does,
that the only issue is the escape of dangerous wild animals that’s
still a pretty major issue when viewed globally. Dangerous animals
are nothing however, when compared to dangerous viruses that may have
been released from chemical labs during the chaos. I suspect that a
few Nuclear reactors may have been breached by trees also but none of
this is mentioned. We are given an unrealistically simplistic view of
what would have been a truly terrifying situation for humanity.
That being said, the many positives of the situation are
also ignored. With that many trees the whole global warming issue
would have been fixed almost instantly. With all the trees apparently
bearing nuts and fruit I guess world hunger is a thing of the past
also? These topics aren’t questioned at all. To go with such a big
story idea but to completely ignore the positive and negative
ramifications of it seems really bizarre.
Now even if you ignore the many larger
issues with logic this episode presents, it has many smaller issues
that it seems to not care about fixing either.
Clara tells The Doctor, after hearing a
wolf howl “No, that is impossible, we are in London!”. To which
he replies “Would that be the London with a zoo? A zoo with a pack
of wolves…No! Wolves are not impossible!”
This sentence has two distinct issues.
Firstly and least importantly, London has several zoos, so it doesn’t
have “a” zoo. Secondly and more importantly, London Zoo doesn’t
have any wolves. London Zoo hasn’t had wolves for a very long time.
The nearest zoos to Trafalgar Square with wolves seem to be
Colchester and Reading. Now Reading Zoo is the nearest and is still 1
hour and 12 minutes by car approximately from The Doctor and Clara.
Even if we accept ‘Doctor Who’
exists in a fictional version of our own world, one where London Zoo
has wolves, the wolves attacking them still doesn’t make sense. Why
aren’t the wolves hunting the other animals at the zoo, or the
other animals in London?
I find it hard to believe that a wolf would choose to risk attacking a human over a domestic dog or cat. Most wild animals don’t eat that often also. Unless the fictional workers of London Zoo were starving them, they must have been fed within 24 hours of the tree situation. I find it hard to believe that captive wolves, ones who have never hunted before, would so quickly risk going out into the world to hunt unless they were starving.
I find it hard to believe that a wolf would choose to risk attacking a human over a domestic dog or cat. Most wild animals don’t eat that often also. Unless the fictional workers of London Zoo were starving them, they must have been fed within 24 hours of the tree situation. I find it hard to believe that captive wolves, ones who have never hunted before, would so quickly risk going out into the world to hunt unless they were starving.
This also entirely ignores the fact
that wolves are scavengers; they’ll eat food they find lying around
before they’ll hunt. I guess that they must have ignored all the
rubbish bags they walked past on their trip from London Zoo to
Trafalgar Square, all 2.5 miles of it!
I’m not even done with the list of
dumb things about this episode. I haven’t even touched on the
stupid things the characters do. Maebh’s mum is angry because the
trees have blocked out the sunlight in her house, so she can’t see
anything. I guess when night time comes she just has to feel around
her house in the dark? Maybe those light switches you have on the
walls could be switched on? It’s just a suggestion.
Sadly enough the biggest idiot in this
episode is The Doctor. Last week he assumed The Boneless might be
friendly, even after they’d killed several people. This week he
automatically assumes the trees are bad in some way. The idea that
they might be friendly doesn’t even cross his mind for the majority
of the episode. In addition he completely ignores a child who
mentions that she gets exterior thoughts that she can’t explain,
despite him having been a vocal believer of psychic powers in a lot
of other stories. He carries and uses psychic paper for crying out
loud!!
Now on the subject of hearing voices;
this episode has another horribly thought out social message. Maebh
has been on pills since her sister went missing, ones to stop her
from hearing voices and having nervous ticks. This makes The Doctor
angry:
“What is it with you people? You hear
voices; you want to shut them up!”
I assume, therefore, that if The Doctor
met someone who heard voices telling them to hurt themselves or other
people he’d just leave them to it? I guess he’d assume that it
was just psychic aliens and let things play out? This anti medication
message is insulting; it’s insulting to everyone who has to take
life improving pills on a daily basis. It’s also insulting to the
real doctors who prescribe them to people, trying to help them. It’s
weird to think that The Doctor, the one who met and understood
Vincent Van Gogh, has such a childish view of mental health issues.
The high levels of stupidity in this script are making me almost ignore the smaller ones. I can’t believe that Clara, a teacher and human, asks The Doctor “Why am I frightened?” when she loses a little girl with apparent mental problems. That being said Clara is written to be pretty unlikable in this episode. When The Doctor offers to save her and Danny she says “Danny Pink would never leave those kids as long as he is breathing” I guess if Danny Pink was willing to leave the kids then Clara would have no issue also with leaving them alone to be eaten by wolves?
The high levels of stupidity in this script are making me almost ignore the smaller ones. I can’t believe that Clara, a teacher and human, asks The Doctor “Why am I frightened?” when she loses a little girl with apparent mental problems. That being said Clara is written to be pretty unlikable in this episode. When The Doctor offers to save her and Danny she says “Danny Pink would never leave those kids as long as he is breathing” I guess if Danny Pink was willing to leave the kids then Clara would have no issue also with leaving them alone to be eaten by wolves?
Now let’s move on to more positive
things about the episode. I’m usually pretty hard on both Clara and
Danny but this week they were considerably better than usual. Danny
in particular was given more character and we, as an audience, could
see and understand the good points that Clara can see. Now this might
have been nicer nine episodes ago, when we were being told to like
him for no reason. Better late than never I guess.
The child actors also weren’t bad, for child actors at least. I could have done with less of Maebh’s
rave dancing but she was pretty good actress for her age and had a
nice spark with The Doctor.
Peter Capaldi is yet again great and
has some really nice lines. The line “I told you they were
rubbish!” when the wolves run away is brilliant. The episode had a
lot of really nice lines in general. Clara’s “I don’t want to
be the last of my kind” was also a good line and it was well
performed.
So what do I think of ‘In the Forest
of the Night’? To be honest the constant stupidity of this episode
is really hard to ignore. This episode has some really interesting
concepts but they are at best handled badly and at worst handled
insultingly. The script does have some really nice pieces of dialogue
but the actual structure is really messy. This episode tries to do
way too much and fails most of what it attempts due to this. So many
elements are introduced that some of them are not explained enough to
warrant them being included in the first place.
My reaction to the very last scene in this episode was to burst out laughing. I was laughing at just how stupid and unexpected the final scene was, I wasn’t alone in this reaction. To be fair, although this episode is probably about as stupid as ‘Kill the Moon’ in terms of science and social issues it didn’t make me as angry. Unlike ‘Kill the Moon’ I didn’t feel any attempt to manipulate me as if I were an idiot. That being said, the fact that watching 'In the Forest of the Night' didn't make me that angry isn't really a recommendation is it?
My reaction to the very last scene in this episode was to burst out laughing. I was laughing at just how stupid and unexpected the final scene was, I wasn’t alone in this reaction. To be fair, although this episode is probably about as stupid as ‘Kill the Moon’ in terms of science and social issues it didn’t make me as angry. Unlike ‘Kill the Moon’ I didn’t feel any attempt to manipulate me as if I were an idiot. That being said, the fact that watching 'In the Forest of the Night' didn't make me that angry isn't really a recommendation is it?
No comments:
Post a Comment