There was a time when Tom Hanks made
comedies. I can only assume that before the Aids, the Second World
War and being stranded in space, he was a more positive person. The
Money Pit is from that lost era. Tom Hanks plays Walter Fielding, an
attorney who specialises in the music industry. He and his partner
Anna Crowley, played by Shelley Long, are convinced to buy a huge
house for $200,000. The apparent low price of the house is quickly
explained as it slowly crumbles around them. Even if they can fix up
the house, will their relationship be able to take the strain?
When I was younger I really liked this
film, so I was looking forward to revisiting it. I think part of why
I liked this film so much was the huge reliance on slapstick comedy
throughout. The majority of the scenes in this film are Tom Hanks or
Shelley Long attempting to use things in the house, only for them to
break in ridiculous ways as they do so. That’s it, that’s the
comedy element covered. Some of these sequences are imaginatively
designed but I didn’t find myself laughing at any of them. One
issue is that most slapstick, if not most comedy, requires a set up.
In ‘Home Alone’ the misfortunes
that befall the Wet Bandits are funny because we see Kevin set up the
traps. We as the audience know what is going to happen to them, they
do not. Thus them trying and failing to avoid the traps becomes
funny. ‘The Money Pit’ lacks these kind of set ups. We see the
couple filling a bathtub with water, it falls through the floor when
they finish. We could have had the floorboards creaking, or dust
falling from the ceiling as they filled it. We don’t get these
traditional set ups because we as the audience are meant to root for
them, hope everything will work out for them. Therefore, to replace
these setup scenes we get characters saying ‘Well at least nothing
else can go wrong’, before things get worse.
It’s a really odd creative choice to
make a film where we are meant to root for people who we are
constantly told to laugh at. The only assumption I can make is that
we are meant to laugh with them. The issue is that if we personally
make an effort to do something in life and it goes wrong we laugh
because it happened to us, because we can see the funny side of it.
We experienced the setup of everything potentially working out so the
pay off of it going wrong has an ironic value. We see Walter and Anna
working hard to try and build the house but we don’t experience it.
We’re a passive observer of their trials and thus, also a passive
observer of their misfortunes. We have no real investment in the
project.
The relationship between Walter and
Anna is not very compelling. Walter is a positive man who makes the
best of things. Anna is cynical and far less optimistic. It is hard
to believe that they got together in the first place, particularly as
they have very little chemistry. Anna has far more chemistry with her
ex-husband Max, which makes it hard to not side with Max’s endless
attempts to break her and Walter up. Walter and Anna constantly say
how much they love each other, although it’s very hard to believe
that they actually do.
As the rebuilding of the house takes
its toll on the couple we get introduced to one of the most
ridiculous situations ever committed to film. Anna is stressed and
spends the evening with Max. Anna wakes up in the morning in bed with
Max and has no memory of the night before. Max tells her that they
slept together. Feeling guilty she tells Walter who is understandably
angry and they break up. Anna is angry that Walter won’t forgive
her for what she views as a drunken mistake. Max then apologies to
her and reveals to her that they didn’t sleep together at all and
that he was trying to break them up.
Max tries to persuade her to patch
things up with Walter but she says “He’s couldn’t forgive me, I
can’t forgive him for that.” Anna is very hard to sympathise with
and yet we are expected to understand both her and Walter’s view on
the situation. Worst of all Walter then forgives her and says “I
think you sleeping with Max is the best thing that could have
possibly happened to us” because “Now I know how much I care
about you”.
‘The Money Pit’ is a really stupid
film. Tom Hanks gives a good performance and the film has some nice
conceptual ideas but overall it just doesn’t work. The jokes fall
flat and the relationship between the leads is confusing. All in all,
‘The Money Pit’ should probably just be demolished.
No comments:
Post a Comment